Re: Propagating GFP_NOFS inside __vmalloc()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:37:39PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> If you _really_ need 1MB of physically contiguous memory, then you'll need 
> to find a way to do it in a reclaimable context.  If we actually can 
> remove the dependency that gfs2, ntfs, and ceph have in the kernel.org 
> kernel, then this support may be pulled out from under you; the worst-case 
> scenario for Lustre is that you'll have to modify the callchains like I 
> suggested in my original email to pass the gfp mask all the way down to 
> the pte allocators if you can't find a way to do it under GFP_KERNEL.

As Dave mentioned XFS also needs GFP_NOFS allocations in the low-level
vmap machinery, which is shared with vmalloc.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]