On Mon 17-10-16 12:59:55, Ross Zwisler wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:47:32AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > This week I plan to rebase both series on top of rc1 + your THP patches so > > that we can move on with merging the stuff. > > Yea...so how are we going to coordinate merging of these series for the v4.10 > merge window? My series mostly changes DAX, but it also changes XFS, ext2 and > ext4. I think the plan right now is to have Dave Chinner take it through his > XFS tree. > > Your first series is mostly mm changes with some DAX sprinkled in, and your > second series touches dax, mm and all 3 DAX filesystems. > > What is the best way to handle all this? Have it go through one central tree > (-MM?), even though the changes touch code that exists outside of that trees > normal domain (like the FS code)? Have my series go through the XFS tree and > yours through -MM, and give Linus a merge resolution patch? Something else? For your changes to go through XFS tree is IMO fine (changes outside of XFS & DAX are easy). Let me do the rebase first and then discuss how to merge my patches after that... Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>