On 09/20/2016 06:24 AM, David Rientjes wrote: > On Sat, 17 Sep 2016, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > >>> > > I'm questioning if this information can be inferred from information >>> > > already in /proc/zoneinfo and sysfs. We know the no-fallback zonelist is >>> > > going to include the local node, and we know the other zonelists are >>> > > either node ordered or zone ordered (or do we need to extend >>> > > vm.numa_zonelist_order for default?). I may have missed what new >>> > > knowledge this interface is imparting on us. >> > >> > IIUC /proc/zoneinfo lists down zone internal state and statistics for >> > all zones on the system at any given point of time. The no-fallback >> > list contains the zones from the local node and fallback (which gets >> > used more often than the no-fallback) list contains all zones either >> > in node-ordered or zone-ordered manner. In most of the platforms the >> > default being the node order but the sequence of present nodes in >> > that order is determined by various factors like NUMA distance, load, >> > presence of CPUs on the node etc. This order of nodes in the fallback >> > list is the most important information derived out of this interface. >> > > The point is that all of this can be inferred with information already > provided, so the additional interface seems unnecessary. The only > extension I think that is needed is to determine if the order is node or > zone when vm.numa_zonelist_order == default and we shouldn't parse this > from dmesg. Okay. Seems like the general view is that this interface is not necessary. Hence wont be posting the debugfs version for now. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>