On Mon 26-09-16 17:16:54, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> On 2016/9/26 16:58, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > On Mon 26-09-16 16:47:57, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> >> commit 97a16fc82a7c5b0cfce95c05dfb9561e306ca1b1
> >> (mm, page_alloc: only enforce watermarks for order-0 allocations)
> >> rewrite the high-order check in __zone_watermark_ok(), but I think it
> >> quietly fix a bug. Please see the following.
> >>
> >> Before this patch, the high-order check is this:
> >> __zone_watermark_ok()
> >> ...
> >> for (o = 0; o < order; o++) {
> >> /* At the next order, this order's pages become unavailable */
> >> free_pages -= z->free_area[o].nr_free << o;
> >>
> >> /* Require fewer higher order pages to be free */
> >> min >>= 1;
> >>
> >> if (free_pages <= min)
> >> return false;
> >> }
> >> ...
> >>
> >> If we have cma memory, and we alloc a high-order movable page, then it's right.
> >>
> >> But if we alloc a high-order unmovable page(e.g. alloc kernel stack in dup_task_struct()),
> >> and there are a lot of high-order cma pages, but little high-order unmovable
> >> pages, the it is still return *true*, but we will alloc *failed* finally, because
> >> we cannot fallback from migrate_unmovable to migrate_cma, right?
> >
> > AFAIR CMA wmark check was always tricky and the above commit has made
> > the situation at least a bit more clear. Anyway IIRC
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_CMA
> > /* If allocation can't use CMA areas don't use free CMA pages */
> > if (!(alloc_flags & ALLOC_CMA))
> > free_cma = zone_page_state(z, NR_FREE_CMA_PAGES);
> > #endif
> >
> > if (free_pages - free_cma <= min + z->lowmem_reserve[classzone_idx])
> > return false;
> >
> > should reduce the prioblem because a lot of CMA pages should just get us
> > below the wmark + reserve boundary.
>
> Hi Michal,
>
> If we have many high-order cma pages, and the left pages (unmovable/movable/reclaimable)
> are also enough, but they are fragment, then it will triger the problem.
> If we alloc a high-order unmovable page, water mark check return *true*, but we
> will alloc *failed*, right?
As Vlastimil has written. There were known issues with the wmark checks
and high order requests.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>