Re: [PATCH] mm: check VMA flags to avoid invalid PROT_NONE NUMA balancing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I was kind of assuming this would go through the normal channels for
THP patches, but it's been two weeks...

Can I have an ACK from the involved people, and I'll apply it
directly.. Mel? Rik?

                   Linus

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just a quick ping on this, let me know if you need anything more from me!
>
> Thanks, Lorenzo
>
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 11:54:25PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
>> The NUMA balancing logic uses an arch-specific PROT_NONE page table flag defined
>> by pte_protnone() or pmd_protnone() to mark PTEs or huge page PMDs respectively
>> as requiring balancing upon a subsequent page fault. User-defined PROT_NONE
>> memory regions which also have this flag set will not normally invoke the NUMA
>> balancing code as do_page_fault() will send a segfault to the process before
>> handle_mm_fault() is even called.
>>

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]