On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:28 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:09 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro >> <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > Because we have an alternative solution already. please try memcgroup :) >> >> >> >> I think memcg could be a solution of them but fundamental solution is >> >> that we have to cure it in VM itself. >> >> I feel it's absolutely absurd to enable and use memcg for amending it. >> >> >> >> I wonder what's the problem in Peter's patch 'drop behind'. >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg179576.html >> >> >> >> Could anyone tell me why it can't accept upstream? >> > >> > I don't know the reason. And this one looks reasonable to me. I'm curious the above >> > patch solve rsync issue or not. >> > Minchan, have you tested it yourself? >> >> Still yet. :) >> If we all think it's reasonable, it would be valuable to adjust it >> with current mmotm and see the effect. > > Who can make rsync like io pattern test suite? a code change is easy. but > to comfirm justification is more harder work. Maybe Ben, Brian those reports the problem. :) -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>