> > Because we have an alternative solution already. please try memcgroup :) > > I think memcg could be a solution of them but fundamental solution is > that we have to cure it in VM itself. > I feel it's absolutely absurd to enable and use memcg for amending it. > > I wonder what's the problem in Peter's patch 'drop behind'. > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg179576.html > > Could anyone tell me why it can't accept upstream? I don't know the reason. And this one looks reasonable to me. I'm curious the above patch solve rsync issue or not. Minchan, have you tested it yourself? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>