Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Add barriers and document switch_mm()-vs-flush synchronization follow-up

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> While backporting 71b3c126e611 ("x86/mm: Add barriers and document switch_mm()-vs-flush synchronization")
>> we stumbled across a possibly missing barrier at flush_tlb_page().
>
> I too noticed it and submitted a similar patch that never got a response [1].
>
> Regards,
> Nadav
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/15/598
>

Yeah, sorry, I've been busy.  I'll try to get to this soon.

-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]