> From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Not worth throwing away the precious reserved free memory pool for allocations
> that can fail gracefully (either through mempool or because they're transhuge
> allocations later falling back to 4k allocations).
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1941,7 +1941,12 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
> alloc_flags |= (__force int) (gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGH);
>
> if (!wait) {
> - alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HARDER;
> + /*
> + * Not worth trying to allocate harder for
> + * __GFP_NOMEMALLOC even if it can't schedule.
> + */
> + if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC))
> + alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HARDER;
> /*
> * Ignore cpuset if GFP_ATOMIC (!wait) rather than fail alloc.
> * See also cpuset_zone_allowed() comment in kernel/cpuset.c.
I like this.
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>