[PATCH 29 of 66] don't alloc harder for gfp nomemalloc even if nowait

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>

Not worth throwing away the precious reserved free memory pool for allocations
that can fail gracefully (either through mempool or because they're transhuge
allocations later falling back to 4k allocations).

Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx>
---

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1941,7 +1941,12 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
 	alloc_flags |= (__force int) (gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGH);
 
 	if (!wait) {
-		alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HARDER;
+		/*
+		 * Not worth trying to allocate harder for
+		 * __GFP_NOMEMALLOC even if it can't schedule.
+		 */
+		if  (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOMEMALLOC))
+			alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HARDER;
 		/*
 		 * Ignore cpuset if GFP_ATOMIC (!wait) rather than fail alloc.
 		 * See also cpuset_zone_allowed() comment in kernel/cpuset.c.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]