Re:[PATCH v2]oom-kill: CAP_SYS_RESOURCE should get bonus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Figo.zhang wrote:
> 
> > CAP_SYS_RESOURCE also had better get 3% bonus for protection.
> >
> 
> 
> Would you like to elaborate as to why?
> 
> 

process with CAP_SYS_RESOURCE capibility which have system resource
limits, like journaling resource on ext3/4 filesystem, RTC clock. so it
also the same treatment as process with CAP_SYS_ADMIN.

Best,

Figo.zhang



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]