On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Figo.zhang wrote: > CAP_SYS_RESOURCE also had better get 3% bonus for protection. > Would you like to elaborate as to why? > Signed-off-by: Figo.zhang <figo1802@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > mm/oom_kill.c | 3 ++- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c > index 4029583..30b24b9 100644 > --- a/mm/oom_kill.c > +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c > @@ -198,7 +198,8 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, struct mem_cgroup *mem, > * Root processes get 3% bonus, just like the __vm_enough_memory() > * implementation used by LSMs. > */ > - if (has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) > + if (has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_ADMIN) || > + has_capability_noaudit(p, CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)) > points -= 30; > > /* -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>