On Mon 01-11-10 20:07:33, Wu Fengguang wrote: > You patches are more complete than mine, so let's use them. However I > do prefer to have a standalone wb_check_background_flush() that is > called _after_ wb_check_old_data_flush(). This helps make the writeout > a bit more ordered and the separation itself looks a bit more clean to > me. > > Followed are the slightly updated patches. IMHO they are straightforward > fixes that could be merged before other writeback changes. One more question - who's going to merge it with Linus? Would you send the patches to Jens' to merge them via the block tree (note that Jens has a new email address since he joined FusionIO)? Or maybe to Andrew? Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/ Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>