Re: [PATCH] mm: don't flush TLB when propagate PTE access bit to struct page.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/29/2010 12:27 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>
>> What happens if we don't flush TLB?
>> It will make for old page to pretend young page.
>> If it is, how does it affect reclaim?
>
> Other way around - it will make a young page pretend to be an
> old page, because the TLB won't know it needs to flush the
> Accessed bit into the page tables (where the bit was recently
> cleared).

Ying's patch just removes TLB flush when page access bit is changed
from young to old.
We still flush TLB flush when from old to young change by
ptep_set_access_flags. Do I miss something?

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]