Re: [PATCH] mm: don't flush TLB when propagate PTE access bit to struct page.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:11 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd like to vote for batching.

Batch mode isn't going to add much value because the effect of
accessed bit is already deferred.  There are two outcome: (1) the tlb
mapping is already flushed due to capacity conflict or (2) process
context'ed out.  You would want to transfer accessed bit from pte to
page table, but flushing TLB on a already deferred operation seems not
that useful.

- Ken

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]