Re: TMPFS Maximum File Size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 26 Oct 2010, Tharindu Rukshan Bamunuarachchi wrote:

> I have two node NUMA system and 100G TMPFS mount.
>
> 1. When "dd" running freely (without CPU affinity) all memory pages
> were allocated from NODE 0 and then from NODE 1.
>
> 2. When "dd" running bound (using taskset) to CPU core in NODE 1 ....
>     All memory pages were allocated from NODE 1.
>     BUT machine stopped responding after exhausting NODE 1.
>     No memory pages were allocated from NODE 0.

Hmmm... Strange it should fall back like under #1. Can you tell us where
it hung?

> Do you have any comment / suggestions to try out ?
> Why "dd" cannot allocate memory from NODE 0 when it is running bound
> to NODE 1 CPU core ?

Definitely looks like a bug somewhere. TMPFS policies are not correctly
falling over to more distant zones?

> Core was generated by `DataWareHouseEngine Surv:1:1:DataWareHouseEngine:1'.
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> #0  0x00007fd924b0cf7c in write () from /lib64/libc.so.6

Hmmm... Kernel oops? Or a segfault because of an invalid reference by your
app?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]