Re: [PATCH 15/20] tile: get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/28/2016 9:24 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
From: Michal Hocko<mhocko@xxxxxxxx>

__GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.

pgtable_alloc_one uses __GFP_REPEAT flag for L2_USER_PGTABLE_ORDER but
the order is either 0 or 3 if L2_KERNEL_PGTABLE_SHIFT for HPAGE_SHIFT.
This means that this flag has never been actually useful here because it
has always been used only for PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY requests.

Cc: Chris Metcalf<cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc:linux-arch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko<mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/tile/mm/pgtable.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

This seems OK as far as I can tell from code review.

Acked-by: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [for tile]

--
Chris Metcalf, Mellanox Technologies
http://www.mellanox.com

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]