Re: [UnifiedV4 00/16] The Unified slab allocator (V4)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, David Rientjes wrote:

> Overall, the results are _much_ better than the vanilla slub allocator
> that I frequently saw ~20% regressions with the TCP_RR netperf benchmark
> on a couple of my machines with larger cpu counts.  However, there still
> is a significant performance degradation compared to slab.

It seems that the memory leak is still present. This likely skews the
results. Thought I had it fixed. Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]