Re: [PATCH v2] sparc64: Add support for Application Data Integrity (ADI)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/07/2016 10:39 AM, Khalid Aziz wrote:
On 03/07/2016 11:12 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
On 03/07/2016 09:53 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
Also, what am I missing?  Tying these tags to the physical page seems
like a poor design to me.  This seems really awkward to use.

Yeah, can you describe the structures that store these things? Surely
the hardware has some kind of lookup tables for them and stores them in
memory _somewhere_.


Version tags are tied to virtual addresses, not physical pages.

Where exactly are the tags stored is part of processor architecture and I am not privy to that. MMU stores these lookup tables somewhere and uses it to authenticate access to virtual addresses. It really is irrelevant to kernel how MMU implements access controls as long as we have access to the knowledge of how to use it.

The tags are stored in physical memory, and you can write a tag directly to that memory via stxa with ASI_MCD_REAL and completely bypass the MMU. When you do that, the tag will still be seen by any virtual address that maps to that physical address.

Rob



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]