Hi, I just tried the master of mmotm and ran into compilation issues on arm: CC arch/arm/mm/mmu.o arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:737:37: error: macro "pte_alloc" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3 void *(*alloc)(unsigned long sz)) ^ arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:738:1: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before ‘{’ token { ^ arch/arm/mm/mmu.c: In function ‘early_pte_alloc’: arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:750:47: error: macro "pte_alloc" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3 return pte_alloc(pmd, addr, prot, early_alloc); ^ arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:750:9: error: ‘pte_alloc’ undeclared (first use in this function) return pte_alloc(pmd, addr, prot, early_alloc); ^ arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:750:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in arch/arm/mm/mmu.c: In function ‘alloc_init_pte’: arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:759:56: error: macro "pte_alloc" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3 pte_t *pte = pte_alloc(pmd, addr, type->prot_l1, alloc); ^ arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:759:15: error: ‘pte_alloc’ undeclared (first use in this function) pte_t *pte = pte_alloc(pmd, addr, type->prot_l1, alloc); ^ arch/arm/mm/mmu.c: In function ‘early_pte_alloc’: arch/arm/mm/mmu.c:751:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] } ^ It looks like this is caused by ebc495cfcea9 (mm: cleanup *pte_alloc* interfaces) which added #define pte_alloc(mm, pmd, address) \ (unlikely(pmd_none(*(pmd))) && __pte_alloc(mm, pmd, address)) and conflicts with arch/arm/mm/mmu.c which is using pte_alloc as a function name. Is this a known issue? If not, Russell would you take a patch to rename the pte_alloc functions in arm? Thanks, Laura -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>