On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:57:22AM -0800, Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:04:29PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > > @@ -2428,10 +2448,11 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc, > > reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed; > > scanned = sc->nr_scanned; > > > > + sc->reclaim_idx = reclaim_idx; > > shrink_zone_memcg(zone, memcg, sc, &lru_pages); > > zone_lru_pages += lru_pages; > > The setting of sc->reclaim_idx is unexpected here. Why not set it in > the caller and eliminate the reclaim_idx parameter? > Initially because it was easier to develop the patch for but it's good either way. I updated this patch and handled the conflicts. It's now set in the callers. Thanks. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>