On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:04:29PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> @@ -2428,10 +2448,11 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> reclaimed = sc->nr_reclaimed;
> scanned = sc->nr_scanned;
>
> + sc->reclaim_idx = reclaim_idx;
> shrink_zone_memcg(zone, memcg, sc, &lru_pages);
> zone_lru_pages += lru_pages;
The setting of sc->reclaim_idx is unexpected here. Why not set it in
the caller and eliminate the reclaim_idx parameter?
> @@ -2558,16 +2579,12 @@ static void shrink_zones(struct zonelist *zonelist, struct scan_control *sc)
> sc->gfp_mask |= __GFP_HIGHMEM;
>
> for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
> - requested_highidx, sc->nodemask) {
It's unfortunate that we start with the lowest zone here. For Normal
allocations, the most common allocations, this will always have two
full shrink_node() rounds that skip over everything >DMA in the first,
then over everything >DMA32 in the second, even though all pages on
the node are valid reclaim candidates for that allocation.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>