Re: [PATCH 01/33] mm: introduce get_user_pages_remote()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/14/2016 10:09 PM, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> > For protection keys, we need to understand whether protections
>> > should be enforced in software or not.  In general, we enforce
>> > protections when working on our own task, but not when on others.
>> > We call these "current" and "remote" operations.
>> > 
>> > This patch introduces a new get_user_pages() variant:
>> > 
>> >         get_user_pages_remote()
>> > 
>> > Which is a replacement for when get_user_pages() is called on
>> > non-current tsk/mm.
>> > 
> In summary then get_user_pages_remote() do not enforce protections?

Yes, exactly.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]