"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hugh Dickins <hughd@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Swapoff after swapping hangs on the G5. That's because the _PAGE_PTE
>> bit, added by set_pte_at(), is not expected by swapoff: so swap ptes
>> cannot be recognized.
>>
>> I'm not sure whether a swap pte should or should not have _PAGE_PTE set:
>> this patch assumes not, and fixes set_pte_at() to set _PAGE_PTE only on
>> present entries.
>
> One of the reason we added _PAGE_PTE is to enable HUGETLB migration. So
> we want migratio ptes to have _PAGE_PTE set.
>
>>
>> But if that's wrong, a reasonable alternative would be to
>> #define __pte_to_swp_entry(pte) ((swp_entry_t) { pte_val(pte) & ~_PAGE_PTE })
>> #define __swp_entry_to_pte(x) __pte((x).val | _PAGE_PTE)
>>
You other email w.r.t soft dirty bits explained this. What I missed was
the fact that core kernel expect swp_entry_t to be of an arch neutral
format. The confusing part was "arch_entry"
static inline pte_t swp_entry_to_pte(swp_entry_t entry)
{
swp_entry_t arch_entry;
.....
}
IMHO we should use the alternative you suggested above. I can write a
patch with additional comments around that if you want me to do that.
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>