On Wed, 6 Oct 2010 19:53:14 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I propose restricting page_cgroup.flags to 16 bits. The patch for the > same is below. Comments? > > > Restrict the bits usage in page_cgroup.flags > > From: Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Restricting the flags helps control growth of the flags unbound. > Restriciting it to 16 bits gives us the possibility of merging > cgroup id with flags (atomicity permitting) and saving a whole > long word in page_cgroup > > Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Doesn't make sense until you show the usage of existing bits. And I guess 16bit may be too large on 32bit systems. Nack for now. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>