On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > Don't mind. but general warning: If you continue to crappy objection, We > are going to revert full of your userland breakage entirely instead minimum fix. > I'm not in the business of responding to your threats. Unfortunately for your argument, you cannot cite a single example of a current user of /proc/pid/oom_adj that considers either (i) expected memory usage of the task, or (ii) system RAM capcacity, which would be required for that value to make any sense given the current implementation. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>