Re: [patch -mm 2/2] oom: use old_mm for oom_disable_count in exec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Looks good. However you need to use tsk->signal->oom_adj == OOM_DISABLE because
> > I removed OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN.
> > 
> 
> KOSAKI, I'm not going to argue this with you.  VM patches, like where you 
> revert oom_score_adj, go through Andrew.  That's not up for debate.
> 
> Thanks for the review.


Don't mind. but general warning: If you continue to crappy objection, We
are going to revert full of your userland breakage entirely instead minimum fix. 


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]