Re: [PATCH 1/5] cgroup: ID notification call back

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:42 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hmm, but placing css and subsystem's its own structure in different cache line
> can increase cacheline/TLB miss, I think.

My patch shouldn't affect the memory placement of any structures.
struct cgroup_subsys_state is still embedded in the per-subsystem
state.

>
> Do we have to call alloc_css_id() in kernel/cgroup.c ?

I guess not, if no-one's using it except for memcg. The general
approach of allocating the CSS in cgroup.c rather than in every
subsystem is something that I'd like to do separately, though.

Paul

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]