On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 17:34:38 -0700 Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:20 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki > <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hmm, sure. I'll change the ->create() interface. O.K. ? > > > > Hmm. An alternative (possibly cleaner) would be: > > 1) add a css_size field in cgroup_subsys that contains the size of the > per-subsystem structure > 2) change cgroups to allocate and populate the css *before* calling > create(), since it now knows the actual size > 3) simplify all the subsystem create() methods since they no longer > have to worry about allocation or out-of-memory handling > 4) also add a top_css field in cgroups that allows cpusets to use the > statically-allocated top_cpuset since it's initialized prior to memory > allocation being reliable > > This avoids us having to pass in any new parameters to the create() > method in future since they can be populated in the CSS. > Ou...I'm sorry but I would like to use attach_id() for this time. Forgive me, above seems a big change. I'd like to write a series of patch to do above, later. At least, to do a trial. Thanks, -Kame -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>