On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 22:13:17 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> This patch-set reworks the kmap_atomic API to be a stack based, instead of
> static slot based. Some might remember this from last year, some not ;-)
>
> The advantage is that you no longer need to worry about KM_foo, the
> disadvantage is that kmap_atomic/kunmap_atomic now needs to be strictly
> nested (CONFIG_HIGHMEM_DEBUG should complain in case its not) -- and of
> course its a big massive patch changing a widely used API.
Nice. That fixes the "use of irq-only slots from interrupts-on
context" bugs which people keep adding.
We don't have any checks in there for the stack overflowing?
Did you add every runtime check you could possibly think of?
kmap_atomic_idx_push() and pop() don't have much in there. It'd be
good to lard it up with runtime checks for at least a few weeks.
> The patch-set is currently based on tip/master as of today, and compile
> tested on: i386-all{mod,yes}config, mips-yosemite_defconfig,
> sparc-sparc32_defconfig, powerpc-ppc6xx_defconfig, and some arm config.
>
> (Sorry dhowells, I again couldn't find frv/mn10300 compilers)
>
> Boot tested with i386-defconfig on kvm.
>
> Since its a rather large set, and somewhat tedious to rebase, I wanted to
> ask how to go about getting this merged?
Well, there's that monster conversion patch. How's about you
temporarily do
#define kmap_atomic(x, arg...) __kmap_atomic(x)
so for a while, both kmap_atomic(a, KM_foo) and kmap_atomic(a) are
turned into __kmap_atomic(a). Once all the dust has settled, pull that
out again?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>