Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2010-08-03, at 11:35, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> - The FS should be block-device-based (e.g. a ram-based FS
>  such as tmpfs should not enable cleancache)

When you say "block device based", does this exclude network filesystems?  It would seem cleancache, like fscache, is actually best suited to high-latency network filesystems.

> - To ensure coherency/correctness, inode numbers must be unique
>  (e.g. no emulating 64-bit inode space on 32-bit inode numbers)

Does it need to be restricted to inode numbers at all (i.e. can it use an opaque internal identifier like the NFS file handle)?  Disallowing cleancache on a filesystem that uses 64-bit (or larger) inodes on a 32-bit system reduces its usefulness.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Technical Lead
Oracle Corporation Canada Inc.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]