Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 06:58:03AM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> CHRISTOPH AND ANDREW, if you disagree and your concerns have
> not been resolved, please speak up.

Anything that need modification of a normal non-shared fs is utterly
broken and you'll get a clear NAK, so the propsal before is a good
one.  There's a couple more issues like the still weird prototypes,
e.g. and i_ino might not be enoug to uniquely identify an inode
on serveral filesystems that use 64-bit inode inode numbers on 32-bit
systems.  Also making the ops vector global is just a bad idea.
There is nothing making this sort of caching inherently global.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]