On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 22:43 +0200, Michał Nazarewicz wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 22:22 +0200, Michał Nazarewicz wrote: > >> Right..... Please show me a place where I've written that it won't be in > >> the kernel? I keep repeating command line is only one of the possibilities. > >> I would imagine that in final product defaults from platform would be used > >> and bootloader would be left alone. > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:34:32 +0200, Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It should never be anyplace else. > > I disagree. There are countless “dubug_level” kernel parameters or even > some “printk” related parameters. Those are completely hardware-independent. > There are also parameters that are hardware dependent but most users won't > care to set them. That's how the things are: there are some defaults but > you can override them by command line parameters. Your not hearing the issues.. IT'S TOO COMPLEX! Please remove it. Daniel -- Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>