On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 22:22 +0200, Michał Nazarewicz wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 22:03:24 +0200, Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 21:53 +0200, Michał Nazarewicz wrote: > >> On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:37:09 +0200, Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > What makes you assume that the bootloader would have these strings? > >> > Do your devices have these strings? Maybe mine don't have them. > >> > >> I don't assume. I only state it as one of the possibilities. > >> > >> > Assume the strings are gone and you can't find them, or have no idea > >> > what they should be. What do you do then? > >> > >> Ask Google? > > > > Exactly, that's why they need to be in the kernel .. > > Right..... Please show me a place where I've written that it won't be in > the kernel? I keep repeating command line is only one of the possibilities. > I would imagine that in final product defaults from platform would be used > and bootloader would be left alone. It should never be anyplace else. Daniel -- Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>