Re: [patch 07/18] oom: filter tasks not sharing the same cpuset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 20:24:55 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Sorry for the delay.
> 
> > On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
> > David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Andrew, are you the maintainer for these fixes or is KOSAKI?
> > 
> > I am, thanks.  Kosaki-san, you're making this harder than it should be.
> > Please either ack David's patches or promptly work with him on
> > finalising them.
> 
> Thanks, Andrew, David. I agree with you. I don't find any end users harm
> and regressions in latest David's patch series. So, I'm glad to join his work.

whew ;)

> Unfortunatelly, I don't have enough time now. then, I expect my next review
> is not quite soon. but I'll promise I'll do.

So where do we go from here?  I have about 12,000 oom-killer related
emails saved up in my todo folder, ready for me to read next time I
have an oom-killer session.

What would happen if I just deleted them all?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]