Re: [patch 07/18] oom: filter tasks not sharing the same cpuset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry for the delay.

> On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:51:32 -0700 (PDT)
> David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Andrew, are you the maintainer for these fixes or is KOSAKI?
> 
> I am, thanks.  Kosaki-san, you're making this harder than it should be.
> Please either ack David's patches or promptly work with him on
> finalising them.

Thanks, Andrew, David. I agree with you. I don't find any end users harm
and regressions in latest David's patch series. So, I'm glad to join his work.

Unfortunatelly, I don't have enough time now. then, I expect my next review
is not quite soon. but I'll promise I'll do.

thanks.


> 
> I realise that you have additional oom-killer patches but it's too
> complex to try to work on two patch series concurrently.  So let's
> concentrate on get David's work sorted out and merged and then please
> rebase yours on the result.
> 
> I certainly don't have the time or inclination to go through two
> patchsets and work out what the similarities and differences are so
> I'll be concentrating on David's ones first.  The order in which we
> do this doesn't really matter.



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]