On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 16:10 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > I just got an idea - if the sleeping is too unfair (as threads at the end > of the FIFO are likely to have 'pause' smaller and thus could find out > earlier that the system is below dirty limits), we could share 'pause' > among all threads waiting for that BDI. That way threads would wake up > in a FIFO order... Sounds sensible. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href