Re: [PATCH 6/9] oom: use same_thread_group instead comparing ->mm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:34:02PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Now, oom are using "child->mm != p->mm" check to distinguish subthread.
> > But It's incorrect. vfork() child also have the same ->mm.
> > 
> > This patch change to use same_thread_group() instead.
> 
> Hmm. I think we don't use it to distinguish subthread. 
> We use it for finding child process which is not vforked. 
> 
> I can't understand your point. 

Thank you. my fault. respin.



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]