[PATCH 6/9] oom: use same_thread_group instead comparing ->mm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Now, oom are using "child->mm != p->mm" check to distinguish subthread.
But It's incorrect. vfork() child also have the same ->mm.

This patch change to use same_thread_group() instead.

Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 mm/oom_kill.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 12204c7..e4b1146 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ unsigned long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long uptime)
 		list_for_each_entry(c, &t->children, sibling) {
 			child = find_lock_task_mm(c);
 			if (child) {
-				if (child->mm != p->mm)
+				if (same_thread_group(p, child))
 					points += child->mm->total_vm/2 + 1;
 				task_unlock(child);
 			}
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static int oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *p, gfp_t gfp_mask, int order,
 		list_for_each_entry(child, &t->children, sibling) {
 			unsigned long child_points;
 
-			if (child->mm == p->mm)
+			if (same_thread_group(p, child))
 				continue;
 			if (oom_unkillable_task(child, mem, nodemask))
 				continue;
-- 
1.6.5.2



--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]