On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 14:30 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > @@ -396,33 +406,24 @@ u64 __init __lmb_alloc_base(u64 size, u64 > align, u64 max_addr) > > if (max_addr == LMB_ALLOC_ANYWHERE) > > max_addr = LMB_REAL_LIMIT; > > > > + /* Pump up max_addr */ > > + if (max_addr == LMB_ALLOC_ANYWHERE) > > + max_addr = ~(u64)0; > > + > > That if is pretty useless as you set max_addr to LMB_REAL_LIMIT > right above. This is a mismerge/mis-rebase of one of my patches actually. I'll dbl check what's up but I think the first hunk should go along with LMB_REAL_LIMIT in favor of the new default limit thing. But we first need to make sure the default is set sensibly and I haven't fixed all archs yet. I'll dbl check what's up there. Cheers, Benm. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>