Re: [PATCH 12/25] lmb: Move lmb arrays to static storage in lmb.c and make their size a variable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 19:44 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> Perhaps it would be better to weight this against MAX_ACTIVE_REGIONS
> for the ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP case? The early node map is already
> using that size, at least. 

Well, one of the next patches implement dynamic resize of the LMB array
so I was actually thinking about shrinking the static one to a
minimum...

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]