On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Mel Gorman <mel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:25:00AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: >> alloc_slab_page never calls alloc_pages_node with -1. > > Are you certain? What about > > __kmalloc > -> slab_alloc (passed -1 as a node from __kmalloc) > -> __slab_alloc > -> new_slab > -> allocate_slab > -> alloc_slab_page > Sorry for writing confusing changelog. I means if node == -1 alloc_slab_page always calls alloc_pages. So we don't need redundant check. -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href