Re: [patch] oom: give current access to memory reserves if it has been killed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 31 Mar 2010, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> Probably something like the patch below makes sense. Note that
> "skip kernel threads" logic is wrong too, we should check PF_KTHREAD.
> Probably it is better to check it in select_bad_process() instead,
> near is_global_init().
> 

is_global_init() will be true for p->flags & PF_KTHREAD.

> The new helper, find_lock_task_mm(), should be used by
> oom_forkbomb_penalty() too.
> 
> dump_tasks() doesn't need it, it does do_each_thread(). Cough,
> __out_of_memory() and out_of_memory() call it without tasklist.
> We are going to panic() anyway, but still.
> 

Indeed, good observation.

> Oleg.
> 
> --- x/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ x/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -129,6 +129,19 @@ static unsigned long oom_forkbomb_penalt
>  				(child_rss / sysctl_oom_forkbomb_thres) : 0;
>  }
>  
> +static find_lock_task_mm(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +	struct task_struct *t = p;
> +	do {
> +		task_lock(t);
> +		if (likely(t->mm && !(t->flags & PF_KTHREAD)))
> +			return t;
> +		task_unlock(t);
> +	} while_each_thred(p, t);
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * oom_badness - heuristic function to determine which candidate task to kill
>   * @p: task struct of which task we should calculate
> @@ -159,13 +172,9 @@ unsigned int oom_badness(struct task_str
>  	if (p->flags & PF_OOM_ORIGIN)
>  		return 1000;
>  
> -	task_lock(p);
> -	mm = p->mm;
> -	if (!mm) {
> -		task_unlock(p);
> +	p = find_lock_task_mm(p);
> +	if (!p)
>  		return 0;
> -	}
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * The baseline for the badness score is the proportion of RAM that each
>  	 * task's rss and swap space use.
> @@ -330,12 +339,6 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_pr
>  			*ppoints = 1000;
>  		}
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * skip kernel threads and tasks which have already released
> -		 * their mm.
> -		 */
> -		if (!p->mm)
> -			continue;
>  		if (p->signal->oom_score_adj == OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN)
>  			continue;

You can't do this for the reason I cited in another email, oom_badness() 
returning 0 does not exclude a task from being chosen by 
selcet_bad_process(), it will use that task if nothing else has been found 
yet.  We must explicitly filter it from consideration by checking for 
!p->mm.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]