On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 06:11:03PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: >>> Andi Kleen kirjoitti: >>>> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:22:58PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Nick Piggin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm just worried there is still an underlying problem here. >>>>> So am I. What caused the breakage that requires this patchset? >>>> Memory hotadd with a new node being onlined. >>> So can you post the oops, please? Right now I am looking at zapping the >> >> I can't post the oops from a pre-release system. >> >>> series from slab.git due to NAKs from both Christoph and Nick. >> >> Huh? They just complained about the patch, not the whole series. >> I don't understand how that could prompt you to drop the whole series. > > Yeah, I meant the non-ACK'd patches. Sorry for the confusion. Ok it's fine for me to drop that patch for now. I'll try to reproduce that oops and if I can't then it might be just not needed. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>