On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Andi Kleen kirjoitti: >> On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:22:58PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote: >>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010, Nick Piggin wrote: >>> >>>> I'm just worried there is still an underlying problem here. >>> So am I. What caused the breakage that requires this patchset? >> >> Memory hotadd with a new node being onlined. > > So can you post the oops, please? Right now I am looking at zapping the I can't post the oops from a pre-release system. > series from slab.git due to NAKs from both Christoph and Nick. Huh? They just complained about the patch, not the whole series. I don't understand how that could prompt you to drop the whole series. As far as I know nobody said the patch is wrong so far, just that they wanted to have more analysis. -Andi -- ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>