On Do, 2024-02-29 at 17:36 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 04:28:42PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > On Do, 2024-02-29 at 15:48 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > [...] And then I elaborated that entire reset framework should > > > rather move towards fwnode. > > > > For context, there have been initial patches for this, that turned out > > not to be necessary later on: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220324141237.297207-1-clement.leger@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > At this point, there still is no real use case for non-DT reset > > controls on the horizon. > > I can argue on that if we have something like reset-gpio (and we have a such). I've just sent out the pull request containing this, thank you for the reminder. > With this in place the ACPI can also provide descriptions for that. Yes, an ACPI based device with shared GPIO resets (it is bound to happen at some point...) would provide a reason to support ACPI GPIOs in the reset framework. regards Philipp
