Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] dt-bindings: hwmon: lm75: use common hwmon schema

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 01/03/2024 11:44, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Hello,
> On Fri Mar 1, 2024 at 11:13 AM CET, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 01/03/2024 10:41, Théo Lebrun wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> On Fri Mar 1, 2024 at 7:53 AM CET, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On 2/29/24 22:37, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 29/02/2024 19:10, Théo Lebrun wrote:
>>>>>> Reference common hwmon schema which has the generic "label" property,
>>>>>> parsed by Linux hwmon subsystem.
>>>>> Please do not mix independent patchsets. You create unneeded
>>>>> dependencies blocking this patch. This patch depends on hwmon work, so
>>>>> it cannot go through different tree.
>>> I had to pick between this or dtbs_check failing on my DTS that uses a
>>> label on temperature-sensor@48.
>> I don't see how is that relevant. You can organize your branches as you
>> wish, e.g. base one b4 branch on another and you will not have any warnings.
> That is what I do, I however do not want mips-next to have errors when
> running dtbs_check. Having dtbs_check return errors is not an issue?

You should ask your maintainer, but I don't understand how this is
achievable anyway. Subsystem bindings *should not* go via MIPS-next, so
how are you going to solve this?

And why MIPS shall be different than all other ARM/RISC-V SoCs?

Best regards,

[Index of Archives]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux