> > @Rob: My memory fails a little bit about these two schemas: we have the > > github one for generic bindings, not strictly related to Linux, right? > > Well, NONE of the bindings are strictly related to linux unless they say > 'linux,' prefix. Ok, right, of course. What I meant was probably: why do we have controller bindings in the kernel and schema bindings in a github tree? For me, this is a tad more difficult to maintain. Like i2c-controller.yaml file has the "no-detect" binding which IMO is wrong in many ways. I rejected the supporting code for Linux. > We need to remove i2c.txt. Often that hasn't happened because we need to > relicense the text from GPL only to dual licensed. From a quick look, > i2c/i2c-controller.yaml appears to have everything in i2c.txt, so I > think we can go ahead and remove it. There's only a few references to > i2c.txt to update with that. I'll send a patch, but please double check > whether you think i2c-controller.yaml is missing anything. Will do, thanks!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
