Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 23/11/2023 16:26, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>> Add a device tree include file for the Mobileye EyeQ5 SoC.
>>
>> Based on the work of Slava Samsonov <stanislav.samsonov@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>
>
>> + aliases {
>> + serial0 = &uart0;
>> + serial1 = &uart1;
>> + serial2 = &uart2;
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu_intc: interrupt-controller {
>> + compatible = "mti,cpu-interrupt-controller";
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #address-cells = <0>;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + gic: interrupt-controller@140000 {
>
> Why do you put MMIO nodes in top-level?
I can move it back under the soc node I think
>
>> + compatible = "mti,gic";
>> + reg = <0x0 0x140000 0x0 0x20000>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Declare the interrupt-parent even though the mti,gic
>> + * binding doesn't require it, such that the kernel can
>> + * figure out that cpu_intc is the root interrupt
>> + * controller & should be probed first.
>> + */
>> + interrupt-parent = <&cpu_intc>;
>> +
>> + timer {
>> + compatible = "mti,gic-timer";
>> + interrupts = <GIC_LOCAL 1 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
>> + clocks = <&core0_clk>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + soc: soc {
>
> Are you sure dtbs_check W=1 does not complain? I think you miss here
> address.
Yes dtbs_check W=1 does not complain. There is no reg property in this
node, so there is no address to add to the name of the node.
Gregory
--
Gregory Clement, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://bootlin.com
