On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 8:11 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 03:33:50PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > > This creates a schema for GPIO controlled NAND. The txt > > schema was old and wrong. > > > > Mark the old way of passing GPIOs in a long array as > > deprecated and encourage per-pin GPIO assignments with > > the named nnn-gpios phandles. > > We have 1 user upstream with only a single commit adding it in 2017. > This doesn't seem like something that's going to gain new users either. > Is it really worth modernizing this binding? The whole ordeal was actually prompted by the emergence of a new user who wants to add a device tree for a new device. So I don't want to add new users for the old bindings. Yours, Linus Walleij
